Why? We've built this site because citizens
wonder what causes otherwise ordinary folks to put themselves in
harm's way to protest a faceless bureaucracy. We built it because the
mainstream media dismisses the anti-globalization movement as
"decidedly left-wing and short on specifics." We are left-wing, and
won't apologize for that, but we aren't short on specifics. This Web
site will complement the brave people in the streets. If you want
anti-globalization talking points for your book group, the office
water cooler, or over the back fence with your neighbors, you've come
to the right place.

A comment about A16 Posted by Kendall Clark on 2000-04-18 01:33:50 Permanent URL
or format for printing
Discuss this item...
Well, 30,000 hits from nearly 1,000 unique sites in 2 weeks
(with no budget and a 'staff' of 2) isn't too bad. Trolling
through the logs I see lots of hits from several insurance
companies, so hopefully we educated some suits or, failing
that, pissed them off!
Thanks to everyone who visited the site, as well as everyone
who sent me information and reports. The site will stay here
permanently to bear witness to what thousands of brave
citizens accomplished in DC during the past two weeks.
I want to thank Niel Bornstein, Bijan Parsia and Collin
Williams, all fellow members of the Monkeyfist Collective, for
helping with this "temporary autonomous" site: for kibbitzing,
political strategizing, technical help, artistic advice, etc.
etc. I couldn't have done it nearly as well without you guys.
And for anyone in the audience who's looking for a new
favorite Web site, if you liked this one, you'll love it's
mother: Monkeyfist.com.
Check it out.
We're planning some special things for the Republican National
Convention at the end of July, including revolutionary
silkscreen artwork and t-shirts, a street theater Punch and
Judy show, lots of Super-8 video on the streets of Philly,
some free software hacking at the Philly IMC, and some
surprises too. Watch Monkeyfist.com for details.
Every time I use technology to aid social change, I'm reminded
of the words Woody Guthrie inscribed on his guitar:
THIS MACHINE KILLS FASCISTS
Peace,
Kendall Clark

North Texas Greens Involved in Mass Arrests at the IAC's Prison-Industrial Complex Rally on Saturday
An update about A16 Posted by Kendall Clark on 2000-04-17 20:05:24 Permanent URL
or format for printing
Discuss this item...
I spoke with Scott Haws, Cliff Pearson and Shane Taylor, of
the Dallas and Tarrant County Green Parties respectively, this
evening as they recounted some of their experiences in DC over
the weekend, particularly further details about the mass
arrests at the Prison-Industrial-Complex rally on Saturday.
None of the North Texas Greens were planning to be arrestable
during the protests, but the DC police's strong-arming tactics
changed all that for two of them. Scott, in DC with his
juvenille son, Milo, went along to the International Action
Committee's permitted rally in front of the FBI. During the
rally, Scott called Cliff via cell phone so that they could
coordinate meeting and attending a DC Statehood Green Party
function. Cliff and Shane were making their way to the IAC
rally when they heard, via scanner, the Federal Protective
Services dispatched to the area of the IAC rally at
approximately 3:30 pm. At approximately 4:05 pm persons
claiming to be members of the "Spartacus League," but almost
certainly agents provacateurs, urged the IAC rally
demonstrators to march toward 20th and K streets where they
encountered a massive police presence, which appeared to have
been waiting to ambush them.
Cliff, an experienced peace activist, believes the police in
DC were as well prepared as any soliders he saw in Kosovo
during his last trip there. "Except for the machine guns,"
Cliff says, "the police were fully decked-out, ready for war."
They were intent on intimidation at every occasion, going so
far, Scott and Cliff both confirm, as "goose-stepping in an
aggressive and fascistic manner."
Having trapped the protesters between barracades and an
adjacent building, the police spent the next two hours herding
as many as 600 protesters, including Scott Haws and his son
Milo, into a small, confined area in preparation of mass
arrests. The media were offered safe passage out of the area
of arrest, but protesters pleaded with them to remain to
document their treatment at the hands of police. Scott Haws
says that from his vantage point, nearly all media complied
with the requests of protester's, including both independent
and corporate media. Cliff and Shane finally arrived in the
area of 20th and I, trying to find their fellow Greens, Scott
and his son Milo. They were able to communicate via cell phone
during the ordeal. According to Scott Haws, who stood very
near them, the leaders of the permitted IAC rally tried
several times, unsuccessfully, to negotiate the ordered
withdrawal of the protesters, but their pleas were ignored.
Scott reports that at no time was an order to disperse given
to the protesters, and that it seemed as if the police meant
to make mass arrests no matter what the protesters did.
While a police helicopter hovered nearby, often directly
overhead, the National Guard finally arrived at the scene.
Protesters who were not encircled by police tried to block the
arrival of National Guard, and Cliff snapped a picture of a DC
police offer slapping a female protester with his open hand
when she stepped in front of a National Guard vehicle. Cliff
immediately yelled out "I took his photo. His badge number is
3255, DC Metro Police." Many police had removed their badges,
as was common throughout the weekend, so that they couldn't be
identified.
After the protesters were finally taken away in police
custody, Cliff and Shane spent several hours trying to track
down the location of Scott and Milo. The National Lawyer's
Guild informed them that Milo, as a juvenille, would be
released, but he was released alone, without his father, in a
city he didn't know. Cliff and Shane found Milo after his
release. They had a long night as they waited for Scott to be
released outside the detention center, spending much of that
time chanting for the release of protesters in one of many
jail solidarity protests on Saturday. He was released after 16
hours, during 12 of which he was held incommunicado, most of
them spent in a detention cell with 41 other protesters. They
were held without food or water and only one trip to the
restroom. Morale remained high, Scott reports, despite some
concerns that they would be held throughout Sunday to prevent
them from returning to join the protests.
The conclusion that these brave Green Party activists took
away from their encounters with police is simple: overwhelming
state-sanctioned violence and disregard of civil liberties was
the minimum required for the IMF and World Bank meeting's to
proceed at all. "Relying on state-sponsored force and
violence," Cliff Pearson summed up, "was the only way the
World Band and IMF were able to pursue their disastrous
policies and programs."

Noam Chomsky On IMF/WB Debt Forgiveness 
A comment about A16 Posted by Kendall Clark on 2000-04-17 16:50:57 References A Beginner's Guide to Debt Crisis
Permanent URL
or format for printing
Discuss this item...
The question:
What do you say to the argument that the countries who
borrowed from the WB/IMF have no right to ask for debt
forgiveness (nor should anyone ask on their behalf) and should
be held responsible for their debts like you or anyone else
would? And to what extent is the first world responsible for
the debt crisis?
Chomsky responds:
The simplest answer to the argument that countries who
borrowed from the WB/IMF have no right to ask for debt
forgiveness is that the presupposition is false, so the
argument is vacuous. E.g., the "country" of Indonesia didn't
borrow; it's US-backed rulers did. The debt, which is huge, is
held by about 200 people (probably less), the dictator's
family and their cronies. So those people have no right to ask
for debt forgiveness -- and in fact, don't have to. Their
wealth (much of it in Western banks) probably suffices to
cover the debt, and more.
Of course, this response assumes the capitalist principle.
According to this principle, if I borrow money from you, use
it to by a Mercedes and a mansion, and send most of the money
to a bank in Zurich, and then you come and ask me to repay the
loan, I'm not supposed to be able to say: "Sorry, I don't want
to pay you back, take it from the folks in the downtown
slums."
And you're not supposed to say: "I got the high yields from
this risky investment, but now that the borrower doesn't want
to pay it back, the risk should be transferred to other folks
in my country through socialization of the debt. That's the
capitalist principle. It would suffice to largely eliminate
the debt. Of course, that principle is unacceptable to the
rich and powerful, who prefer the operative "capitalist"
principle of socializing risk and cost. So the risk is shifted
to northern taxpayers (via the IMF) and the costs are
transferred to poor peasants in Indonesia, who never borrowed
the money.
The argument that "their country" borrowed the money so that
they are responsible surpasses cynicism, and need not be
considered. In fact, it doesn't even stand up under
international law. When the US conquered Cuba in 1898 to
prevent it from liberating itself from Spain (what is called
"the liberation of Cuba from Spanish rule"), it cancelled
Cuba's debt to Spain on the reasonable grounds that the debt
had been forced on the people of Cuba without their consent.
That doctrine, called "odious debt," was later upheld in
international arbitrarion, with US initiative. The current US
executive-director at the IMF, international economist Karen
Lissakers, pointed out in a book a few years ago that if this
principle were applied to third world debt, it would mostly
disappear. But that would mean that the capitalist principle
would have to be observed: borrowers have the responsibility,
lenders take the risk. And that plainly won't do, when the
concentration of power makes it possible to socialize cost and
risk.
On first-world responsibility for the debt crisis, it is huge
-- and in this case, the responsibility extends to citizens,
insofar as their countries make possible some degree of
participation in policy formation, and they do. The current
debt crisis can be traced back to policies of the IMF and
World Bank encouraging lending/borrowing to recycle
petrodollars in the 1970s. Their very confident
recommendations that this was just great for all concerned
continued up to the moment of the Mexican default in 1982,
when the system threatened to crash, and the same institutions
stepped in to socialize cost and debt. Another factor was the
sharp rise in interest rates in the US under the
late-Carter/Reaganite policies of a form of "structural
adjustment" here, undertaken with no concern, of course, for
the fact that this would impose a crushing burden on third
world debtors, as it did. Another factor, of course, is
Western support for the murderers, gangsters, and robbers who
borrowed the money for themselves and, naturally, don't want
to pay it back, when they can get the burden shifted to the
poor by the same institutions that created the debt in the
first place.
First world responsibility is enormous, so much so that if
honesty were conceivable, those who supported folks like
Suharto in Indonesia, drove the lending-borrowing craze (then
bailing out the banks), and sharply increased interest rates
as part of the further shift of power to the rich and
privileged in the US (and that's not all), should be paying
the debt themselves.
The culpability of third world governments -- say, Suharto in
Indonesia -- is enormous, but remember that these governments
are western clients, outposts virtually, whose task is to open
their countries to foreign plunder, repress the population (by
huge massacres if necessary), and enrich themselves if they
feel like it (that's not a responsibility, just an incidental
benefit accorded them). Suharto was "our kind of guy," as the
Clinton administration put it, as long as he fulfilled this
role. Much the same hold for other third world governments.
Those that try to follow another course typically get smashed.
E.g., Nicaragua has one of the highest debts in the world. The
Sandinistas were doubtless corrupt, though not by preferred US
standards, but that's not the reason for the debt: rather, the
fact that the US waged a brutal and murderous war to get them
back into line.
Note again that culpability of our governments (and their
institutions, like the IMF-WB) are also our culpability, to
the extent that we have the capacity to influence policy, and
don't.

A comment about A16 Posted by Kendall Clark on 2000-04-16 23:17:32 Permanent URL
or format for printing
Discuss this item...
Vandana Shiva -- one of the real heroes of the
anti-globalization movement -- is a beautiful and brave human
being. Be sure to watch this interview in which she speaks
truth about power, and its abuses, in DC, particularly the
illegal search, and subsequent closure, of the protester's
Convergence Center.
Watch the interview [RealVideo, 3:02]

A comment about A16 Posted by Kendall Clark on 2000-04-16 23:08:30 Permanent URL
or format for printing
Discuss this item...

A comment about A16 Posted by Kendall Clark on 2000-04-16 15:09:21 Permanent URL
or format for printing
Discuss this item...
I watched some tape earlier of savage police assaults
on seated, non-violent, peaceful, grounded protesters,
including one cop swinging apparently as hard as he could with
a baton, striking a protester repeatedly.
I grew up around cops and have known many of them well. All of
them were gentle, decent people. And the only thing I can
imagine would make them act this savagely is fear. But
what are they afraid of from citizens expressing their
political views?
As a citizen, then, I am compelled to wonder what kind of
"training" were DC -- and Seattle -- cops given that makes
them so fearful of non-violent, unarmed protesters that
they would savagely attack them. Some of the wire reports are
calling the clashes between police and protesters "violent"
clashes, failing to discriminate precisely enough between
one-way and two-way violence. It's inaccurate and misleading
to say "police and protesters clash violently" as a headline
when the body of the story recounts only one-way violence,
police-on-protester. There hasn't been a single report
of protester violence yet.
When a cop swings away, full-force, at a seated protester
before his colleague sprays large amounts of capsicium-based
pepper spray directly in the protesters face, that kind
of savagery can only be the result of some serious
anti-democracy propaganda, masquerading as police training.
The Chief of DC police said on Saturday that his job was to
"allow the protesters to exercise their rights but only as
long as they don't hinder the rights of the World Bank and IMF
to hold meetings." The rights to free speech and peaceable
assembly to seek the redress of grievances are the
bedrock of American political life; but I've been
searching the Constitution frenetically trying to find some
place where the right of the World Bank and IMF to hold
meetings at all costs is guaranteed. Sounds like the Chief
of DC Police needs a lesson on the Constitution.

An update about A16 Posted by Kendall Clark on 2000-04-15 16:33:17 Permanent URL
or format for printing
Discuss this item...

A web link about A16 Posted by Kendall Clark on 2000-04-15 16:15:48 Permanent URL
or format for printing
Discuss this item...
Jay Sand, IMC coordinator, gives a breaking report via cell
phone to the IMC in the wake of a police raid of the
Convergence Center, set up to welcome IMF/World Bank critics.
Jay Sand, coordinator of the IMC in DC, was attending an A16
Mobilization meeting when firemen interrupted and brought in
police to clear critics from the building.
Reports from media teams inside the center claim that the
firemen were wearing ATF badges.
According to Sand, firemen entered the convergence space, set
up to meet the thousands of activists expected for the
anti-globalisation protests planned for Sunday, and told
activists to leave. The reason for the order was an alleged
fire code violation. Firemen said that if IMF/World Bank
critics didn't immediately evacuate, they would be forced to
call police. Police were in fact standing by.
Sand said, at the time of a phone call to the IMC at 9:20am on
Saturday, that police were barricading critics inside the
convergence center.
IMC sources noted that the police were not wearing
identification of any kind.
Critics refused to leave without their protest equipment,
puppets, and other materials created this past few weeks in
preparation for the demonstrations on Sunday, April 16, known
as A16, an international day of action against corporate
globalization.
And this follow-up on the effects of this police raid filed by
Troy Skeels
Following the 8:30am police raid on the "Convergence Space"
under pretense of fire code violations, a16 activists have
dispersed to other locations in the neighborhood.
The ease with which this movement without leaders was able to
regroup following the raid hints that, perhaps the authorities
don't have the situation as under control as they might think.
What the police must have imagined to be a devastating blow
against the mobilization - overrunnning the headquarters - has
proved to be only a minor setback. And if the mood at the new
space (Irving Wilson Center at 15th and Columbia) is any
indication, it appears the authorities have once again lost by
winning.
Word of mouth has it that international media has closely
covered the raid and activists from the Global South have
taken the opportunity to point out that this is exactly the
kind of repression that the IMF/WB inspire in their own
countries. Further, early reports that a "fully constructed
molotov coctail," was found on the premises have been since
retracted., proving again that the authorities will tell any
kind of lie to justify their use of force.
It might be remembered that the presence of a "molotov
cocktail" in the crowd was one excuse used to explain the
police riot in Seattle on December 1st. After all these months
it has still never been explained where the police got that
bit of information, nor have police even attempted to produce
any evidence supporting their assertion. It was simply yet
another official untruth, useful for it's short term
perjorative effect in justifying the authorities violent
tactics.
As of midafternoon, the street in front the the Convergence
Space remained blocked with police tape and some incredibly
bored looking motorcycle cops. Police are still inside the
convergence building itself, doing who knows what. At any
rate, it seems to be a sizable police investigation of what is
ostensibly a violation of the fire code.
According to Vijay, from Boston, shortly after the raid began
this morning, quick thinking activists managed to save
numerous personal effects and some useful equipment with a
spontaneous "bucket brigade," passing items out of the
building in the initial confusion. At least some of the
puppets are reported to have escaped arrest and are currently
hiding out in an undisclosed location.
RealVideo of the Convergence Center Raid [1:15, with
audio]

Soccer Showdown!
An update about A16 Posted by Kendall Clark on 2000-04-15 00:24:37 Permanent URL
or format for printing
Discuss this item...
DC's Anarchist Soccer League (ASL) challenges World Bank to
soccer showdown. It is time for the policy makers to take
direct responsibility for the concerns of the general public.
We feel it is the best option to take to the streets, and
thus, we challenge the official to put up or shut up.
"If they win, we won't protest their catastrophic policies
until Prague - if we win, they have to cancel Third World
debt. It's that simple," said Kadd Stephens, an ASL
member.
On April 16th, the ASL will descend on downtown DC in
anticipation of the high-stakes match-up, hoping that this
show of peaceful, good sportsmanship will entice World Bank
delegates to "come out from behind those silly barricades and
quit being so damned paranoid," said ASL regular Alanna Bolan.
The game will take place in some close proximity to the World
Bank and IMF buildings.
The anarchists insist that the challenge is non-violent, and
will not involve property destruction. When asked about
potential breaking of windows, ASL member Dave Duffy responded
"I think I just broke wind."
The Radical Cheerleading Squad and Anarchist Drum Line are
expected to provide halftime entertainment. The
representatives from the World Bank are responsible for the
refreshments that will be served at halftime.
The Anarchist Soccer League was formed in 1998 and plays
weekly pick-up matches at Ft. Reno park every Sunday at 2pm.
All are welcome, aside from scab reporters who cross picket
lines -- they suck.
Below is the note that was sent to World Bank and IMF
officials.
Dear Heads of The World Bank and IMF,
We in the Anarchist Soccer League cordially invite you to
take part in a soccer match at 6:30 a.m. on the morning of
April 16th. This match will have stakes, though, if we win,
you have to cancel the entire Third World Debt and if you
win we will not protest your existence until Prague in
September. We think that these stakes are reasonable and
see no reason why our offer will be refused. I hope that
you understand that failure to show up for the game will
result in forfeit, which means that we win and you must
cancel the debt.
Thank you very much and see you on the pitch,
The Anarchist Soccer League

A web link about A16 Posted by Kendall Clark on 2000-04-14 17:33:26 Permanent URL
or format for printing
Discuss this item...
Jeff Wiggin, the brains behind Blogit, is covering the
A16 events carefully. Since his politics seem to be right-on,
and there's so much to cover, we're pointing our respective
audiences at both sites so they can struggle toward the full
picture. Looks like so far Jeff is analyzing the mainstream
sites, which is helpful since their coverage is historically
terrible on events like this.
A little independent Web publisher solidarity never
hurt anyone!

A comment about A16 Posted by Kendall Clark on 2000-04-14 17:11:37 Permanent URL
or format for printing
Discuss this item...
Ooh, the very scary anarchists are ruining America, working
for things like an end to all forms of hierarchy and
oppression, the devolution of power to local communities,
economic and social justice. Ooh, very scary... Well, maybe
not. Before you get too upset at the prospect of an anarchist
takeover of DC, let's see what the anarchists
themselves say they want to accomplish in their protests
against the IMF and World Bank. The bad old anarchists have a
Web site and
everything!
Read the Revolutionary
Anti-capitalist Bloc statement.

Protests and Tactics
A comment about A16 Posted by Kendall Clark on 2000-04-14 13:45:09 Permanent URL
or format for printing
Discuss this item...
Two faulty assumptions persistently crop up when I talk to
people about Seattle and about the impending events in DC.
First, most folk assume, because the mainstream media refuses
to make clear distinctions, that everyone in the Seattle
protests was an anarchist and that property violence was the
aim of all the protesters. That's not true. There were (at
least) three types of street-level activity going on: the
'mainstream' non-violent protest; the anarchist protest that
employed politically-motivated property damage; opportunists
who used the protests as a chance to steal stuff.
Second, people assume that violence against property, even if
politically motivated, is only a kind of crime and not
a form of political expression with criminal implications.
Smashing a window to rob something is a property crime.
Smashing a window because it represents a
multi-national corporation that exploits child labor in the
developing world is, or can be, a political act of dissent and
protest.
I'm not arguing for or against a particular kind of protest or
political expression (though I am willing to say that violence
against persons, including institutional violence, is morally
problematic in a way that violence against property isn't; the
law and, more crucially, our enforcement of the law should
more clearly reflect this moral judgment). I'm arguing for the
recognition of these distinctions: non-violent protest and
direct action; protest and direct action incorporating
politically-motivated property damage; opportunistic property
crimes.
We're likely to see some of all three in DC in the next few
days, so watch your local and national media to see if they
keep these distinctions clearly separated. If they don't,
either they're stupid, or they're doing a disservice to
democracy by spreading propaganda.

A web link about A16 Posted by Kendall Clark on 2000-04-14 13:23:27 Permanent URL
or format for printing
Discuss this item...
The DC Metropolitan Police have a page of "safety tips"
regarding the A16 demonstrations. Great, I think, I can see
what they recommend for dealing with the pepper spray, baton
blows and tazer shocks. But, no, what we find there are safety
tips for business and property owners about
"demonstration-proofing" their stuff.
Isn't that nice? It at least has the virtue of making police
priorities very clear. There's not a single word about
how people might make themselves safe from police
tactics. The criminal code for DC says,
A riot in the District of Columbia is a public disturbance
involving an assemblage of 5 or more persons which by
tumultuous and violent conduct or the threat thereof creates
grave danger of damage or injury to property or persons.
Property over persons! The legal definition of a riot sounds a
lot like every St Patrick's Day parade or Redskins game I've
ever attended.
But let's be fair, they could have told us how to be safe from
the tactics of the demonstrators for that matter. Those
papier maché puppets can be dangerous, and don't
get me started on the hazards of leftists in turtle suits!

A comment about A16 Posted by Kendall Clark on 2000-04-12 14:29:48 Permanent URL
or format for printing
Discuss this item...
The fine folks at Zmag.org
have a fairly comprehensive page about world trade issues and
protests. What's particularly notable is the range and quality
of analysis of the political economy of world trade, from
luminaries like Noam Chomsky, Weissman and Mokhiber, David
Grossman, etc.
If you're clamoring for alternatives and solutions, this is a
good place to start.

Filipino Activists Censored
An update about A16 Posted by Kendall Clark on 2000-04-12 12:57:45 Permanent URL
or format for printing
Discuss this item...
Thousands and thousands of citizens are taking to the streets
in direct democratic and civic involvement. But what we think
of as 'democracy in action,' the elites try to dismiss, or
marginalize, or criminalize as a crisis of democracy.
And what are the tools of the elites for dealing with
democratic crises? Censorship and propaganda, pepper spray and
rubber bullets. We can only rationally expect it to get much,
much worse before it gets better at all.
The People's Campaign Against Imperialist Globalization
(PCAIG) today deplored the U.S. government for causing the
closure of a university hall where U.S.-based Filipinos and
other people of color were to hold a symposium in line with
the protests surrounding the Spring Meeting of the
International Monetary Fund and World Bank in Washington
D.C.
The forum titled "Imperialist Globalization: Its Impact on the
Environment and Human Rights" was to be held at George
Washington University's Corcoran Hall on April 15. Government
and school officials announced on April 10 that they were
closing the universiy to outsiders.
The forum, sponsored by Amnesty International, was one of the
activities under the Filipino-led People's Assembly Against
IMF-WB.. "This is the way they treat Filipino activists here
in Washington. They are taking away our right to speak up
against the harsh impacts of imperialist globalization," said
PCAIG convenor and Bayan Vice Chairperson Dr. Carolina
Pagaduan-Araullo who is now in the U.S. as a speaker at the
said forum. "It's like martial law here at the U.S. capital.
Just to make the IMF-WB meeting look good, the U.S. government
is using all means to stop the protest actions and thwart
discussions against imperialist globalization," Araullo
added.
Araullo, a veteran of last year's "Battle in Seattle," will
be joined by South African anti-apartheid leader Dr. Dennis
Brutus and Friends of the Filipino People leader Boone
Schirmer. The venue has been moved to the Church of the
Brethren, also at the U.S. capital, on April 15.
"We ask Filipinos and Americans to condemn this fascist
assault on the right to free expression, assembly and the
right to dissent against the IMF-WB," she exhorted.
Last year, the PCAIG was also refused a permit to stage a
rally in Seattle during the World Trade Organization summit.
However, this did not stop them from pushing through with the
march and joining thousands of others in a historic show of
protest against globalization.

A web link about A16 Posted by Kendall Clark on 2000-04-11 15:35:33 Permanent URL
or format for printing
Discuss this item...
A very clever, well-done satire of the World Bank Web site. A
must visit.

A web link about A16 harvested from Democracy Now! Posted by Kendall Clark on 2000-04-11 13:14:06 Permanent URL
or format for printing
Discuss this item...
How do you get a banker's attention? Hit him or her squarely
on the bottom line. The World Bank Boycott campaign is calling
for an end to the private financing of the World Bank. If you
have a pension fund or other investment tool that invests in
bonds, you may be supporting the World Bank unwittingly. Do
some research and then act appropriately. The World Bank
Boycott Web site is a great resource.
The World Bank raises 80% of its funds through bonds which are
sold to investors on private capital markets. Today is the
public launch of a boycott against World Bank bonds, which is
being organized in eleven countries, including South Africa,
Ecuador, and Pakistan. Beverly Bell, Director of the Center
for Economic Justice said, "The fact that labor unions,
churches, universities, and municipalities own these bonds
gives ordinary citizens the opportunity to take power away
from this destructive institution."
"When investors realize that their money is being used to
damage the environment, destroy indigenous communities and
trample human rights, they will move their investments to less
controversial projects," says Neil Tangri of Washington,
D.C.-based Essential Action. Even before the campaign's
official launch, several socially responsible investment firms
(including Trillium Assets Management of Boston and
Progressive Assets Management of New York) have pledged not to
buy World Bank Bonds. In addition, the city of Berkeley,
California and Local 9423 of the Communications Workers of
America in San Jose, California have passed resolutions to
boycott the future purchase of World Bank bonds. Similar
resolutions have been initiated in communities and
institutions throughout the United States.

A web link about A16 Posted by Kendall Clark on 2000-04-11 12:46:48 Permanent URL
or format for printing
Discuss this item...
OneWorld.net has put together a fairly comprehensive site
about the campaign against the World Bank and IMF. It's not
being kept as up-to-minute as this site, but it's still worth
a look. Check it out.
On April 16 the World Bank and the IMF hold their annual
meeting in Washington DC. Tens of thousands of anti-free
trade, Third World Debt and other civil society campaign
groups will converge on the city to challenge policies they
say are deepening poverty and inequality across the world. Get
the latest news, action and background stories from
OneWorld.net.

A web link about A16 Posted by Kendall Clark on 2000-04-10 14:41:46 Permanent URL
or format for printing
Discuss this item...
Seven people were arrested in downtown Washington and traffic
was tied up for 45 minutes this morning in the first street
action of protests this week against the World Bank and the
International Monetary Fund.
Police said three were arrested who were trying to lead a
protest rally from the top of a rental truck, two others after
they chained themselves to the vehicle and two others who
officials said tried to unfurl a banner on the World Bank
building.
Hundreds of protesters have come to the city to protest
policies of the World Bank and the IMF during the groups'
spring meetings, which start Tuesday. They say they hope to
build on the momentum of protests against the WTO that turned
ugly in Seattle, resulting in disruption of the meetings and
tear-gassing of protesters.

Revolutionary Gardening
A comment about A16 Posted by Kendall Clark on 2000-04-10 02:47:49 Permanent URL
or format for printing
Discuss this item...
People continue to ask about alternatives: how about replacing
the damage structural adjustement loan conditionalities do to
subsistence farming in the Global South with sustainable,
local agriculture and micro-lending? Agribusiness and
export-driven cash crops are the among leading causes of
famine and food-security crises worldwide. One affinity group
coming to the A16 protests is focused on these issues. When
agribusiness and genetically-modified foodstuffs are the order
of the day, planting a simple garden can be a revolutionary
act.
Welcome to D.C. The A16 Guerilla Gardening Collective is proud
to hand over the reigns of leadership of the agrarian
revolution into your willing and capable hands. Guerilla
gardens are revolutionary infrastructure. Seizing back control
of our own food supply from multinational corporations is one
of the first steps in eliminating our dependence on those
corporations, and eliminating our dependence is the first step
towards freedom.
If our embryonic revolution is to grow into a mass movement
that will change the course of history it must seize the
imaginations of working people. We must illustrate viable
alternatives to the present madness. We must do it creatively
enough that they cannot credibly label us as terrorists, and
militantly enough that we cannot be ignored.
Listed below are a number of scenarios. Choose the one that
appeals to you, or create your own, organize your affinity
group, and do it.
-
Tree planting canvas: This action is for
individuals or pairs. It involves going door to door in
the neighborhoods of D.C. with saplings and flyers. When
people answer the door tell them you are offering to
plant them a tree for free if they agree to give it a
marker stake and water it, as young trees need a lot of
care to make it through the first year. Give them a
flyer about the IMF/World Bank effects on global forests
and use it as an opportunity to start conversations,
build community support, and reforest the city one yard
at a time.
-
Community Gardens: There are plenty of existing
community gardens that could use a hand, so if that is
what your group is interested in, give us a call and
we'll try to hook you up with some locals.
-
Urban Reclamation: Throughout the city there are
abandoned lots just waiting to be discovered and
reclaimed by the people and Mother Earth. These actions
provide opportunities for us to connect the issues of
the environment, community control, biotechnology and
the role of the IMF/World Bank when we talk to the media
and the community members walking by.
-
Spectacle on the Green: This one is going to be
the most confrontational and is going to require a
well-organized cluster of affinity groups. The idea is
to liberate a section of greenspace in central D.C. This
idea has the potential to create a powerful image of the
people reclaiming the capitol city in a creative and
beautiful way. All the details are left to you for
obvious reasons.

A web link about A16 Posted by Kendall Clark on 2000-04-09 23:34:27 Permanent URL
or format for printing
Discuss this item...
The BBC takes a fairly objective look at the A16 protests and
the IMF/World Bank.
Campaigners from around the world are targeting the spring
meeting of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and World
Bank in Washington to launch a series of demostrations and
protests.
They are hoping to repeat the success of the demonstrations
at the world trade talks in Seattle in December, which
succeeded in disrputing the meeting, which ultimately
collapsed without agreement.
The same coalition of activists - including trade unions,
environmental groups, and development activists - are expected
to converge on Washington during the coming week.
On Sunday they plan a mass demonstration and rock concert to
"raise consciouness about globalisation,"
Later in the week, a mass demonstration of trade unionists
opposed to a US trade deal with China will take to the
streets.
And non-violent direct action around the world is being
planned for Sunday April 16 when the IMF and World Bank spring
meetings formally open.
The IMF acting managing director, Stanley Fisher, met with
environment and develop groups in March to try and convince
them that the organistion was sympathetic to their concerns.

Protesters Converging on DC
An update about A16 Posted by Kendall Clark on 2000-04-09 23:07:34 Permanent URL
or format for printing
Discuss this item...
The vanguard of what could be thousands of protesters began
arriving in Washington, D.C., today for the start of week-long
demonstrations they hope will shut down meetings of the
International Monetary Fund and World Bank.
``People are pouring in, and we're getting ready to hit the
streets,'' said Laura Jones, a leader of one of the hundreds
of groups planning the protests scheduled to lead up to the
joint meetings on April 16-17 of the World Bank and IMF.
Organizers inspired by massive protests at last December's
summit of the World Trade Organization in Seattle will stage
marches, street theater and teach-ins, and form ``human
chains'' to accuse the two lenders of pursuing policies that
harm poor people and the environment.
The protest plans have prompted police in Washington to
mobilize thousands of officers to guard against any repeat of
the violence in Seattle. The scheduled demonstrations also
have altered meeting preparations at the IMF and World Bank,
which have told most of their employees to stay home on April
17.
The largest and most confrontational events are set for April
16, when thousands of people are expected for a downtown rally
against the IMF and World Bank and others plan to engage in
civil disobedience that's expected to result in arrests as
demonstrators try to close down the groups' meetings.
(report filed by Paul Basken)

A web link about A16 Posted by Kendall Clark on 2000-04-08 19:37:12 Permanent URL
or format for printing
Discuss this item...
Read the 50 Years platform; it's full of alternatives to the
existing international finance regime.
Above all, the Network calls for the full participation of
affected women and men in all aspects of World Bank and IMF
projects, policies and programs. This requires far-reaching
changes in the lending policies, internal processes and
structure of the World Bank and the IMF. Only when these
reforms are implemented will these institutions be able to
play a positive role in support of equitable and sustainable
development. This will require the following:
-
Openness and full public accountability of the Bretton
Woods institutions and the systematic integration of
affected women and men in the formulation,
implementation, monitoring and evaluation of World Bank
and IMF projects and policies;
-
A major reorientation of World Bank- and IMF-financed
economic-policy reforms to promote more equitable
development based upon the perspectives, analysis and
development priorities of women and men affected by
those policies;
-
An end to environmentally destructive lending and
support for more self-reliant, resource-conserving
development;
-
The scaling back of the financing, operations, role and,
hence, power of the World Bank and the IMF and the
rechanneling of financial resources thereby made
available into a variety of development assistance
alternatives; and
-
A reduction in multilateral debt to free up additional
capital for sustainable development.

Do the protesters have alternatives?
An update about A16 Posted by Kendall Clark on 2000-04-08 18:21:59 Permanent URL
or format for printing
Discuss this item...
I tried to explain to someone recently, who was criticizing
the World Economic Forum protesters in Davos earlier this year
for not engaging in "thoughtful conversation," that protests,
particularly direct actions, are not meant to be places of
thoughtful conversation or reflection. But, I said, direct
actions are always accompanied by teach-ins and conferences in
which thoughtful people lay out alternatives to institutions
like the IMF and World Bank. The A16 protests are no
exception; two such conferences are
-
forum on Altenatives to Corporate Globalization at 5pm on
the Thursday the 13th at the Church of the Reformation, 222
East Capitol St NE
-
"Bearing the Burdens and Creating Alternatives" which
focuses on women activists world wide; from 2-4pm on
Thursday the 13th at St. Stephen's Episcopal Church, 1525
Newton St. NW.
The issue of 'alternatives' is a bit tricky since it's just as
often used to dismiss critics of the status quo as it is to
inquire sincerely about other ways of organizing the world.
But the IMF and World Bank, particularly through structural
adjustment programs as conditions of development loans, do
such damage to the global South that it would be better if
they were just disbanded altogether.
We always have the alternative of stopping harmful actions and
replacing them with nothing. It's better to have no
international development apparatus than the neoliberal one we
have now.

A web link about A16 Posted by Kendall Clark on 2000-04-07 14:47:18 Permanent URL
or format for printing
Discuss this item...
The Medical Team will help you, the warriors for global
justice, stay as active, healthy and engaged in the struggle
as possible. We will provide free treatment to the best of our
ability to anyone who requests it. We will offer 'straight'
(allopathic) and 'complementary' (herbal, homeopathic, etc.)
care.
The primary health care will take place in the protest zone
by trained Street Medics, and you the protesters. The medics
will facilitate assistance to anyone who desires it. The
medics will be assigned to areas of action, affinity groups,
and/or hot zones.
Make sure to read the How to deal with
tear gas, pepper spray and rubber bullets? page.

Free Speech in Short Supply in D.C. High Schools
An update about A16 Posted by Kendall Clark on 2000-04-07 02:23:15 Permanent URL
or format for printing
Discuss this item...
If you're in high school in D.C. these days, the closest
you're likely to be able to get to your free speech rights is
civics class. In addition to their other thuggery, the D.C.
police have been, in concert with high school administrators,
tearing down A16 posters and organizing literature found in
local high schools.
Poor students didn't realize that you're not actually supposed
to expect free speech, it's just one of those things
they talk about in high school.

IMF Denying Press Credentials to Non-corporate Media
An update about A16 Posted by Kendall Clark on 2000-04-06 14:38:04 Permanent URL
or format for printing
Discuss this item...
In an effort to shape the mainstream media coverage of the
upcoming IMF and World Bank protests, the IMF is denying media
accreditation to independent, community or alternative
journalists.
Ron Smith, an independent journalist, says, "I just talked to
the lovely people at IMF, and they claimed, as they told me
about my rejection, that no community stations are being
accepted. 'we have to draw the line somewhere'. I was applying
under KAOS FM Olympia, a local station in Olympia Washington."
Julie Light, editor at Corporate Watch, adds that, "my
collegues and I at Corporate Watch were just denied
credentials. I've called the IMF to protest and have not heard
back...I'm managing editor of Corporate Watch and a
full time working journalist. This is the first time in over
15 years as a journalist that I've been denied credentials.
I'm spitting mad!."
According to its press office, the IMF does "not provide press
accredition to public access TV, community radio, nor student
or academic publications to attend our meetings."
The IMF apparently only feels comfortable accrediting
professional journalists, where professional means
"corporate". Why's that? If the IMF and World Bank want
accurate coverage, don't they have to accredit non-corporate
journalists? Where does this leave Web-based, non-profit,
academic, community and public access journalists? It
effectively leaves them out in the cold.
The Media Alliance has released a press release with
additional detail.

A Dozen Reasons to Come to DC for April 16
A comment about A16 Posted by Kendall Clark on 2000-04-06 12:32:26 Permanent URL
or format for printing
Discuss this item...
by Russell Mokhiber and Robert Weissman
The next citizen showdown against corporate globalization will
be on April 16 and 17, when thousands of people come to
Washington, D.C. to protest -- through legal demonstrations
and/or civil disobedience -- the politics of the International
Monetary Fund (IMF) and World Bank. For details on events, see
www.a16.org. Here's a dozen reasons why you should join the
protests:
1. IMF/World Bank structural adjustment programs have
increased poverty around the world.
Structural adjustment -- the standard IMF/World Bank policy
package which calls for slashing government spending,
privatization, and opening up countries to exploitative
foreign investment, among other measures -- has deepened
poverty around the world. In the two regions with the most
structural adjustment experience, per capita income has
stagnated (Latin America) or plummeted (Africa). Structural
adjustment has also contributed to rising income and wealth
inequality in the developing world.
2. IMF/World Bank "debt relief" for poor and indebted
countries is a sham.
Many poor countries must devote huge portions of their
national budgets to paying back foreign creditors -- often for
loans that were made to or for dictators, wasteful military
spending or boondoggle projects. The money used to pay back
debt subtracts from essential expenditures on health,
education, infrastructure and other important needs.
The IMF/World Bank plan to relieve poor countries' debt burden
will leave most poor countries paying nearly as much as they
currently do. And all of the debt relief is conditioned on
countries undergoing years of closely monitored structural
adjustment.
3. The IMF has helped foster a severe depression in Russia.
Russia in the 1990s has witnessed a peacetime economic
contraction of unprecedented scale -- with the number of
Russians in poverty rising from 2 million to 60 million since
the IMF came to post-Communist Russia. The IMF's "shock
therapy" -- sudden and intense structural adjustment -- helped
bring about this disaster. "In retrospect, it's hard to see
what could have been done wrong that wasn't," says Mark
Weisbrot of the Center for Economic and Policy Research.
4. The IMF helped create and worsen the Asian financial
crisis.
The IMF encouraged Asian countries to open their borders to
"hot money" -- speculative finance invested in currency,
stocks and short-term securities. That was an invitation to
trouble. The Asian financial crisis resulted from the hot
money brokers' herdlike decision to leave Asian countries en
masse.
Once the crisis hit, the IMF made things worse by requiring
structural adjustment as a condition for IMF loans. The result
was a surge in bankruptcies, layoffs and poverty. In
Indonesia, poverty rates rose from an official level of 11
percent to 40 to 60 percent, depending on the estimate. At one
point, Indonesia's food shortage became so severe that
then-President Habibie implored citizens to fast twice a week.
Many had no choice.
5. The IMF bails out big banks.
The IMF bailouts in Asia, like those in Russia and Mexico,
directed money to those countries largely for the purpose of
paying off loans to foreign banks. Thanks to the IMF, the
banks escaped significant losses for imprudent lending
decisions. Citigroup, Chase Manhattan and J.P. Morgan were
among the beneficiaries of the "Korean" bailout.
6. IMF/World Bank structural adjustment programs devastate the
environment.
Structural adjustment demands an increase in exports and
foreign exchange earnings. As a result, explains Friends of
the Earth, "Countries often over-exploit their resources
through unsustainable forestry, mining and agricultural
practices that generate pollution and environmental
destruction."
7. IMF/World Bank structural adjustment programs contribute to
the spread of HIV/AIDS.
Here's how Dr. Peter Lurie and collaborators explained the
problem in the journal AIDS: The displacement of the rural
sector under structural adjustment programs -- as imports
undermine local farmers and the shift to large-scale
plantations for exports further displaces the rural population
-- contributes to migration and urbanization. Many men leave
rural villages for work in big cities or in mines, contract
HIV/AIDS from casual sex partners or sex workers, and then
spread the disease to spouses in their home village. The
displacement of children and young women into the cities has
led to a sharp increase in commercial sex work and heightened
rates of HIV/AIDS.
8. IMF/World Bank structural adjustment programs harm women.
Cuts in budget spending, mandated by structural adjustment
programs, leave women to pick up the pieces -- with government
services eliminated, women are forced to provide informal
social supports for the sick and disabled. The IMF/Bank
emphasis on exports has pushed women farmers to switch from
growing food for family consumption to crops for exports --
and left them poorer in the process. The high interest rates
associated with structural adjustment have made credit less
accessible, undermining the viability of small women-owned
businesses.
9. IMF/World Bank structural adjustment programs and Bank
project loans have led to deforestation worldwide.
The export orientation demanded by structural adjustment
policies has led to more forest cutting. And World Bank forest
sector loans to countries around the world have done nothing
to improve the situation.
"Although the [1991 Bank Forest] policy had dual objectives of
conservation of tropical moist forests and tree planting to
meet the basic needs of the poor, Bank influence on containing
rates of deforestation of tropical moist forests has been
negligible in the 20 countries with the most threatened
tropical moist forests." Who said that? The World Bank's own
Operations Evaluation Department, in November 1999!
10. World Bank policies have displaced millions of people
around the world.
World Bank loans for dams and major infrastructure projects
routinely require removal of massive numbers of people from
their homes and destruction of their communities. In addition
to the emotional hardship of leaving their land, the displaced
people almost always find their quality of life diminished
after the move. The Bank itself agrees. A 1994 report from the
World Bank's Environmental Department found that, "Declines in
post relocation incomes are sometimes significant, in certain
cases reaching as much as 40 percent for people who were poor
even before their displacement."
11. The World Bank's International Finance Corporation (IFC)
provides corporate welfare for environmentally destructive
projects.
The IFC finances and provides advice for private sector
ventures and projects in developing countries in partnership
with private investors. Among its private sector partners:
ExxonMobil, BP, Coca-Cola, Kimberly-Clark and Marriott.
There's no reason for a public development institution,
supposedly working to fight poverty, to lend its support to
these well-endowed multinationals. Making matters worse, many
of the private sector projects supported by the IFC,
especially in the oil and gas sector, are environmentally
destructive.
12. April 16 is a chance to make history.
While massive protests against IMF and World Bank policies are
commonplace in the developing world -- from Jordan to
Indonesia, Venezuela to Zambia -- the IMF and World Bank are
not accountable to populations in those countries. In
contrast, there has never been a demonstration of more than a
few hundred people to challenge IMF and Bank policy in the
United States -- the largest and most influential shareholder
in the institutions.
That's going to change on April 16. The thousands of people
who will attend the April 16 protests will forever change the
political context of debates on IMF and the World Bank -- the
best hope for billions in the developing world who have been
subjected to the IMF and Bank's brutal policies with no
recourse.
Special bonus reason to come to D.C.: With large puppets,
colorful pagaentry, militant protests, Emcee Michael Moore at
the legal demonstration on the Ellipse, and lots of great
music, the protests will be a fun-filled festival of
resistance.
Reprinted with permission.

A web link about A16 Posted by Kendall Clark on 2000-04-05 16:01:36 Permanent URL
or format for printing
Discuss this item...
There's a growing movement calling for international debt
cancellation. If you're not very familiar with the structure
of international entities like the World Bank and the IMF, you
may think debt cancellation is a bad idea. "After all," you
may be thinking, "countries shouldn't borrow money they can't
repay."
But if you want to make an informed decision about about debt
cancellation, you have to have all the facts, and Jubilee
2000's Beginner's Guide to Debt Crisis is a good place to
start.

Mozambique Hurt by Debt Cancellation Refusals
A comment about A16 Posted by Kendall Clark on 2000-04-04 13:23:16 Permanent URL
or format for printing
Discuss this item...
Mozambique, a country of 20 million inhabitants, has just
suffered the worst floods for 30 years. The government
estimates the cost of reconstruction at $250 million. While
the industrialized countries point to the emergency aid they
have provided to the victims, they are discreetly demanding
that the Mozambican authorities repay the country's foreign
debt. Mozambique, which is one of the poorest countries on the
planet must pay its debt, money it could use to meet the basic
human needs of its people. The country's foreign debt amounts
to $8.3 billion. The creditors fall into three groups:
-
the multilateral financial institutions (World
Bank/IMF), who hold $2.1 billion, or around a quarter of
the total (the "multilateral debt");
-
foreign states, who hold $4.3 billion, around half of
the total (the "bilateral debt");
-
private financial institutions, who hold $2 billion, or
a quarter (the "private debt").
Continued...

A web link about A16 Posted by Kendall Clark on 2000-04-04 02:28:51 Permanent URL
or format for printing
Discuss this item...

And so it begins... In Florham Park, NJ, on Saturday,
activists greeted delegates, arriving for plenary sessions,
with, as Brooke Lehman writes, a
forty foot banner depict[ing] two bloody corporate hands
squeezing the life out of the global south with the caption
"World Bank and IMF = Corporate Colonialism." As the banner
was unfurled hundreds of local and federal law enforcement
officers stood helplessly below.
It's not expected that law enforcement will always be so
quiescent.

A web link about A16 Posted by Kendall Clark on 2000-04-03 14:34:29 Permanent URL
or format for printing
Discuss this item...
Can't make it to DC? Print these out and placard your
neighborhood. Or print a few out and replace those mindless
"Team Work" posters at work.

A web link about A16 Posted by Kendall Clark on 2000-04-03 14:05:10 Permanent URL
or format for printing
Discuss this item...
To understand why people are protesting the World Bank and IMF
in Washington D.C., you first have to understand what
the World Bank and IMF do.
Global Exchange has a helpful World Bank/IMF factsheet. Read
it carefully before passing judgment on the protesters.

Visit the Monkeyfist a16.DC archive for more articles.
|